ARCUS | Arctic Research Consortium of the United States
ARCSS Overview

Updates From the ARCSS Committee

ARCSS Meetings

Community Planning

Community Surveys

ARCSS Synthesis Process

ARCSS Research Efforts

Synthesis of Arctic System Science

ARCSS Committee

ARCSS Publications

ARCSS Listserve

ARCSS Data Coordination

Contact Information

ARCSS Program | Co-oP Concept Paper Submissions By Author

To return to the main Concept Paper page, click here.


Lilian Na'ia Alessa  Complexity and Synthesis in Arctic Hydrology
Thomas Douglas  Arctic TRACE: Tracking Routes of Atmospheric Components in the Environment
Ivan Eyefor Watts  (Example Submission) The Arctic Energy Budget
Kenneth Hinkel  Thaw Lakes and Basins in the Arctic Landscape
Andrea Lloyd  Surface Dynamics and Human Environments of the Arctic System
Patricia Matrai  Ocean-Atmosphere-Sea Ice- Snowpack (OASIS) Interactions
Gifford Miller  Volcanoes in the Arctic System

Thomas Douglas

Thomas Douglas
Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
Thomas.A.Douglas@erdc.usace.army.mil

Q1. What is the tentative name of the proposed Community of Practice (Co-oP)?

Response: Arctic TRACE: Tracking Routes of Atmospheric Components in the Environment

Q2. List up to three keywords that describe the primary focus of this Community of Practice concept.

Response: Atmosphere, environmental tracers, food webs

Q3. Identify the lead contact person(s), as well as other key Co-oP participants.

Response: Thomas A. Douglas (CRREL Alaska) Thomas.A.Douglas@erdc.usace.army.mil
Bill Simpson (University of Alaska Fairbanks) ffwrs@uaf.edu
Jesse Ford (Oregon State University) jesse.ford@oregonstate.edu

Q4. What are the focusing science questions and goals of the Co-oP? (<300 words)

Response: The overarching question for this community of practice is the following:
How will the deposition of atmospheric chemical components to the Arctic respond to changing climates as well as fluxes of emissions and particulates to the Arctic atmosphere from lower latitudes?

The following four questions further focus the main objective:
1) What controls deposition rates of atmospheric contaminants to arctic sea ice, snow, vegetation, soils, and freshwater and marine environments?

2. How would changes in the fluxes of chemical species from lower latitudes affect interactions between the atmosphere and Arctic ecosystems?

3. How would fluxes and controls in the current system respond to a warming arctic?

4. Are there natural processes that ÒcleanÓ the Arctic system or otherwise armor it against contaminant uptake?

Q5. How do the Co-oP science question(s) and goals fit within arctic system-scale science and the overall ARCSS Program goals? (<300 words)

Response: Atmospheric contaminants follow complex routes to the Arctic before they are deposited onto ecosystem receptors and undergo biological transformation and uptake. Atmospheric processes that promote deposition are wide ranging and are often unique to each contaminant. Processes include photochemical reactions, active halogen chemistry, and aerosol surface heterogeneous chemistry to name a few. Many of the chemical components entering the Arctic terrestrial regime biomagnify in foodwebs after they are deposited to sea ice, snow, water, vegetation or soils. Native peoples and predators at high trophic levels are thus at risk for incorporating contaminants into their diet at many times the concentration initially deposited onto the landscape.

Arctic ecosystems are unique because of the dramatic seasonal variations in sunlight, temperature, moisture content and biological activity. Ongoing environmental change in the Arctic will likely modify surface temperature, sea ice extent, and precipitation. These changes may have a marked effect on fluxes of atmospheric chemical components both to and within the Arctic, but the potential responses of Arctic systems to these changes is not well understood. In addition, the emission rates of many chemical components that migrate to the Arctic are likely to increase in the future, especially from major sources in Asia and Western Europe. The reaction of the Arctic system to a combination of warming and changing atmospheric inputs is unknown.

Addressing the scientific questions given above will require multidisciplinary investigations to formulate a system-level understanding of how the Arctic receives, takes up, transforms, and stores atmospheric chemicals. A multi-chemical species approach is particularly illuminating because each chemical component has a different atmospheric chemistry, depositional regime, soil storage capacity and biological uptake regime. By tracking the deposition and storage pathways of selected chemical components in the Arctic system we can learn more about primary system processes and their responses to system changes.

Q6. What other groups and disciplines do you expect the Co-oP to interact with?

Response: Atmospheric chemists, meteorologists; hydrologists, geomorphologists and geochemists; snow and sea ice physical scientists; ecologists; microbiologists; fisheries and wildlife biologists; systems level modelers; social scientists; science educators; Native and Village Tribal leaders; local educators.

Q7. What is the appproximate number of currently active Co-oP participants?

Response: Less than 30, more than 10

Q8. What is the approximate size and scope of anticipated future Co-oP participation?

Response: More than 30

Q9. What other researchers or groups (based on expertise, focus, methodology, etc) would you like to connect with in order to further develop the Co-oP goals and science questions?

Response: Microbiologists, systems level modelers, ecologists, meteorologists

Q10. What type of support from the ARCSS Science Management Office would best facilitate your Co-oP development?

Response: Online Bulletin Board
Shared electronic workspace (wiki)
Electronic email list

Q11. What additional (other) Science Management Office support would facilitate your Co-oP development?

Response: Assistance in offering a face-to-face workshop which is a future goal